Noone will re-use it anyways - No benefit for struggling sharing openly

How to respond

Two extremes of either doing everything of OS or if too difficult - do nothing at all

Opportunities naming instead of the checklist 'Am I open enough?'

Communicate practical examples of why OS is good for your research

How to protect individual information in shared data? Work on access conditions, i.e. not completely open, but already some info is open (e.g. metadata) * Open enough to prevent too many requests for closed data

Requests about correctness of entries rather than reuse —> an ideal of reusable OS is still in an unforeseeable future